For 99% of users, they will be happy with an EF mount, especially considering the stellar combination of features the camera otherwise puts out. Of course, the counter-argument is that going for a more modern, shallower mount is worrying too much about the future and not enough about the present. Especially since it seems like RED is going to go for the EOS R mount on their hinted Komodo unit. You could use an "open" mount instead of the "Canon" mount. You could use an L to LP adapter for PL lenses. However, if Blackmagic had gone with something like the "L" mount, and then maybe even included an L to EF adapter in the first year's orders, there would still have been support for all of those EF lenses and the camera would feel a bit more future proof. With decades of history, you can buy beautiful EF mount lenses from a variety of manufacturers that will fit your needs. There are more lenses in EF mount in the world than probably any other interchangeable lens mount. What does exist for EF is the worlds largest selection of lenses. The EF mount really doesn't adapt to anything much at all since there are very few lenses that have a flange focal distance that is so much larger than 44mm that there is room to fit an adapter in between. A number of manufacturers made adapters for MFT to PL, EF, L, or whatever weird old lens your heart desires. In fact, Metabones just made a special speed booster adapter for the BMPCC 4K that is particularly enticing. With the BMPCC 4K, which uses MFT and its 19.25mm mount, you can adapt it to almost anything you want for cinema, especially PL.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |